|
|
|
|
|
Galleria Tassonomica
di
Natura Mediterraneo
|
|
|
| Autore |
 Discussione  |
|
|
boccaccio
Utente nuovo
Città: Ruvo di Puglia
Prov.: Bari
Regione: Puglia
14 Messaggi
Flora e Fauna |
 Inserito il - 10 maggio 2009 : 13:59:35
|
Could do better! Why EU Rural Development Policy is failing to reach its biodiversity potential
07-05-2009
New study reveals poor implementation is undermining a biodiversity friendly policy
On 7 May 2009 BirdLife International and the RSPB (BirdLife in the UK), with the support of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, launched their new study at an event held in Brussels. The study ‘Could do Better, How is EU Rural Development Policy delivering for biodiversity’ reviews the potential effects on biodiversity of the 2007-2013 Rural Development Programmes across the European Union – and underlines the need for fundamental agriculture policy reform for the post 2013 period.
At the event BirdLife blamed national governments for not using the environmental opportunities the Rural Development Policy provides.
The main findings of the report show that, although EU Rural Development policy has the potential to tackle the decline of biodiversity, only a very small proportion of current Rural Development spending is benefiting Europe’s nature, while many potentially harmful investments such as irrigation expansion, drainage and extension of road networks, are still funded without appropriate safeguards.
If the Rural Development policy is to genuinely benefit EU wildlife, then much better implementation is needed by Member States. Funds must be channelled towards efficient schemes which are based on scientific data instead of meaningless schemes designed mostly to please particularly powerful farm lobbies. There is also a need for detailed and explicit environmental safeguards such as proper impact assessments for all investments in order to prevent the depletion of water resources, increased carbon emissions, and fragmentation or degradation of habitats.
Ariel Brunner, Senior EU Agriculture Policy Officer at BirdLife International, stated: “Rural development is the way forward for the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy. When implemented well, it can help solve many of the huge problems we face in the countryside, like soil degradation, wildlife decline and climate change. The problem is that at the moment, national implementation is often shameful: many governments seem more interested in channelling money towards well-connected farm lobbies than delivering on their own stated objectives”.
"The Commission and national governments must make urgent and profound changes if Rural Development is to remain a credible model for public spending on agriculture" —Ariel Brunner, Senior EU Agriculture Policy Officer at BirdLife International
The presentation of the study was followed by a lively panel debate, which included Martin Scheele from DG Agriculture, Klaus Stern from the European Court of Auditors, Ariel Brunner from BirdLife and Alexandre Meybeck from the French Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.
Ariel Brunner added: "Almost all Member States now have some good agri-environment schemes capable of saving our declining wildlife, but funding is still systematically biased in favour of ineffective schemes that are really just hidden income-support for farmers. Both the Commission and national governments must make urgent and profound changes if Rural Development is to remain a credible model for public spending on agriculture”.
In the study, BirdLife presented a number of case studies illustrating best and worst practice. Good examples included schemes that pay farmers for conserving biodiversity-rich landscapes such as steppe-lands and dehesas (cork oak grazed woodlands), or to restore wetlands and grasslands. Among the negative examples were ill-designed schemes that pay farmers to plough up hilly slopes causing increased erosion (in Cyprus), use the same amount of fertilizer they would be using anyway (in Finland), or to establish super-intensive olive plantations (in Spain).
In some cases, Rural Development investments are actively subsidising environmental destruction as in the case of Portugal where 200,000 ha of biodiversity rich drylands are earmarked for conversion to irrigated farming with heavy impacts on threatened species and an increase of unsustainable water use.
A questa pagina potete trovare il link al rapporto:
Link
|
|
| |
Discussione |
|
|
|
 Natura Mediterraneo |
© 2003-2020 Natura Mediterraneo |
 |
|
Leps.it | Herp.it | Lynkos.net
|
Forum
|
Registrati
|
Msg attivi
|
Msg Recenti
|
Msg Pvt
|
Utenti
|
Galleria |
Map |
Gadgets
|
Cerca
|
|
FAQ | Regole |
| 
| 
Suggerimento: L'iscrizione al nostro Forum è gratuita e permette di accedere a tutte le discussioni.
rapporto BirdLife su sviluppo rurale nella UE
